Why is it so difficult to legislate on alcohol in Spain?

Authors

  • Alicia Rodríguez-Martos Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), España. Enviar correspondencia a: Alicia Rodríguez-Martos. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. Pl Lesseps, 1 Barcelona 08023. Tel.: 34 932027705.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.292

Keywords:

alcohol policy, control measures, young people

Abstract

Wine belongs to the Mediterranean culture. Drinking alcohol is part of our social life, and its negative consequences have often been minimised, blame being apportioned rather to the individual, who doesn’t know how to drink, than to the agent causing the harm. In recent years, road accidents and binge-drinking among young people have put alcohol on the political agenda. Adolescents and young adults have increased their consumption, and a pattern of binge-drinking has developed based on the open-air ‘fiesta’ nightlife, where groups of young people drink large bottles in the streets and squares (botellón). Educational campaigns and material have been mounted and produced, but two consecutive draft laws on measures for the prevention of alcohol-related harm have failed to be approved, coming up on both occasions against the same vested interests. This editorial reviews the ambivalence of society towards regulations on alcohol and the current state of the art. The first draft law (2002) was about preventing alcohol problems in the general population; the second (2006) was limited to the question of prevention among minors. Nobody could oppose it, not even the industry. However, an interested bias put the accent on wine – which allegedly should be considered not as alcohol but rather as food, and consequently removed from the law – so that discussion of the draft law became a ‘wine war’, with predictable consequences. Once again, a draft law on alcohol was shelved sine die and tossed into a corner to gather dust. Within this pessimistic scene, though, there are still some positive signs. No economic or political motives should constitute an obstacle to the protection of minors, at the very least.

References

Observatorio Español sobre Drogas, Informe 2004. Madrid. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas, 2005

Rodríguez-Martos A. Ley del Botellón versus Ley de la Bota de Vino. Adicciones 2003; 15: 3-5.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Consejo, al Parlamento Europeo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones. Una estrategia de la Unión Europea para ayudar a los Estados miembros a reducir los daños relacionados con el alcohol. Bruselas, 24.10.2006 COM (2006) 625 final.

Calafat A. El abuso de alcohol en los jóvenes. Adicciones 2007; 19: 217-24.

Asociación de Usuarios de la Comunicación. Menores y Medios de Comunicación. Publicidad, televisión, Internet. (Documentos AUC, http:// www.auc.es).

Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K, Grube J, et al. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2003.

Greenberg MD, Morral AR, Jain AK. How can repeat drunk drivers be influenced to change? Analysis of the association between drunk driving and DUI recidivists’attitudes and beliefs. J Stud Alcohol 2004;

: 460-63.

Conclusiones del Consejo de 5 de junio de 2001 sobre una estrategia comunitaria para reducir los daños derivados del consumo de alcohol - DO C 175 de 20.6.2001, p.1.

Recomendación 2001 /458/ce DEL Consejo – DO L 161 de 16.6.2001, p. 38.

Asociación de Usuarios de la Comunicación. Nota de prensa, 12-06-07 (http:// www.auc.es).

Reglamento (CE) Nº 1924/2006 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 20 de diciembre de 2006 relativo a las declaraciones nutricionales y de propiedades saludables en los alimentos. Diario Oficial de la Unión

Europea 30.12.2006. L 404/9 – L 404/25.

Published

2007-12-01

Issue

Section

Editorial